PROIECTAREA COST-EFICIENTĂ A MOTORULUI DE INDUCȚIE TRIFAZATE: O ABORDARE DE OPTIMIZARE
Mots-clés :
Moteur à induction, Rentable, Optimisation de la conception, Algorithme de recherche gravitationnelleRésumé
La conception rentable peut être réalisée de plusieurs manières, par exemple en réduisant le coût de l'énergie perdue, en réduisant les coûts de fabrication, en réduisant les coûts de maintenance annuels, etc. Les moteurs à induction triphasés sont largement utilisés comme la machine la plus efficace de l'industrie car ils sont fiables et économiques. La conception rentable de ce moteur est un grand défi pour les ingénieurs. La conception du moteur à induction est un problème d'optimisation non linéaire et multivariable. Ainsi, tout le problème dépend de la sélection des variables et des contraintes. Un nombre moindre de contraintes entraîne des performances médiocres et, d'autre part, une mauvaise sélection des limites des variables donne la dimension impaire du moteur. Le travail proposé porte sur la conception et l'optimisation du coût de production soumis à diverses contraintes avec un nombre choisi de variables. Un algorithme de recherche gravitationnelle (GSA) est utilisé pour obtenir les résultats optimaux souhaités, et sur cette base, les indices de performance et le coût de production sont calculés. L'algorithme proposé est utilisé pour trouver le coût optimal pour deux moteurs, et enfin, la sortie est comparée à l'optimisation de l'essaim de particules (PSO) pour valider les résultats. La production de GSA montre des valeurs plus acceptables des paramètres de conception et des indices de performance, qui sont projetés dans la section des résultats et discutés dans la section des conclusions.
Références
(1) J.P. Wieczorek, Ö. Göl, Z. Michalewiez, An evolutionary algorithm for the optimal design of induction motors, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 34, 6, pp. 3882–3887 (1989).
(2) J. Faiz, M.B.B. Sharifian, A. Keyhani, A. Proca, Performance comparison of optimally designed induction motors with aluminum and copper squirrel-cages, Elect. Mach. and Power Sys. 28, pp. 1195–1207 (2000).
(3) J.P. Wieczorek, Ö. Göl, Z. Michalewicz, An evolutionary algorithm for the optimal design of induction motors, IEEE Trans. On Magnetics, 34, 6, pp. 3882–3887 (1998).
(4) R Basak, H Yahoui, N. Iauve, Cost optimal design of induction motor by genetic algorithm, J. of Basic and Applied Research International, 21, 2, pp. 62–71 (2017).
(5) E. Rashedi, H. Nezamabadi-Pour, S. Saryazdi, GSA: a gravitational search algorithm, Information Sciences, 179, 13, pp. 2232–2248 (2009).
(6) H.M. Emara, W. Elshamy, A. Bahgat, Parameter identification of induction motor using modified particle swarm optimization algorithm, Proc. of the 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Cambridge, UK, pp. 841–847 (30 June–2 July 2008).
(7) J. Faiz, M. Ghaneei, A.Keyhani, A.B. Proca, Optimum design of induction motors for electric vehicles, Electric Power Components and Systems, 28, pp. 1177–1194 (2000).
(8) M.R. Feyzi, H.V. Kalankesh, Optimization of induction motor design by using the finite element method, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2, pp. 845–850 (2001).
(9) M.B.B. Sharifian, H.V. Kalankesh, M.R. Feyzi, Multi-objective optimization of induction motor slot design using finite element method, Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems, 3, pp. 1308–1311 (2003).
(10) S. Lachecinski, M. Dems, S. Wiak, Hybrid optimization algorithms in designing of induction motor at occurrence continuous and discontinuous decision variables, Int. Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines and Power Electronics, pp. 541–546 (2007).
(11) J. Faiz, M.B.B. Sharifian, Optimal design of an induction motor for an electric vehicle, European Transactions on Electrical Power, 16, pp. 15–33 (2006).
(12) RH.A. Hamid, AM.A. Amin, RS. Ahmed, AA.A. El. Gammal, New technique for maximum efficiency of induction motors based on particle swarm optimization (PSO)”, 32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics, 3, pp. 2176–2181 (2006).
(13) E.S. Abdin, G.A. Ghoneem, H.M.M. Diab, S.A. Deraz, Efficiency optimization of a vector controlled induction motor drive using an artificial neural network, Proceeding of the 29th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 3, pp. 2543–2548 (2003).
(14) M. Çunkaş, R. Akkaya, Design optimization of induction motor by genetic algorithm and comparison with existing motor, Mathematical and Computational Applications (MCA), 11, pp. 193–204 (2006).
(15) S. Subramanian, R. Bhuvaneswari, Multi objective optimal design of three phase induction motor using simulated annealing-technique, COMPEL, 24, pp. 141–1427 (2005).
(16) R. Bhuvaneswari, S. Subramanian, Optimization of three-phase induction motor design using simulated annealing algorithm, Electric Power Components and Systems, 33, pp. 947–956 (2005).
(17) A. Sayyah, M. Aflaki, A.R. Rezazade, GA - based optimization of total harmonic current distortion and suppression of chosen harmonics in induction motors, International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, pp. 1361–1366 (2006).
(18) Z. Rouabah, F. Zidani, B. Abdelhadi, Efficiency optimization of induction motor drive using genetic algorithms, Proceedings of the 4th IET Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and Drives, pp. 204–208 (2008).
(19) A. Koechli, B.K. Fussell, S.R. Prina, D.A .James, Y. Perriard, Design optimization of induction motors for aerospace applications, IEEE Industry Applications Conference, 4, pp. 2501–2505 (2004).
(20) A.H. Isfahani. H. Lesani, B.M. Ebrahimi, Design optimization of linear induction motor for improved efficiency and power factor, IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference, pp. 988–991 (2007).
(21) M. Gavrilas, R. Toma, Flexible alternating current transmission system optimization in the context of large disturbance voltage stability, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. Électrotechn. et Énerg., 66, 1, pp. 21–26 (2021).
(22) A.H. Isfahani, B. M. Ebrahimi, H. Lesani, Design optimization of a low-speed single-sided linear induction motor for improved efficiency and power factor, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 44, pp. 266–272 (2008).
(23) Habbi, Fatiha, Nour El Houda Gabour, M. Bounekhla, New dynamic Genetic Selection Algorithm: Application to Induction Machine identification, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. Et Énerg., 66, 3, pp. 145–151(2021).
(24) V. P. Sakthivel, R. Bhuvaneswari, S. Subramanian, an improved particle swarm optimization for induction motor parameter determination, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 1, 71–76 (2010).
(25) V. Kumar, J. K. Chhabra, D. Kumar, Automatic cluster evolution using gravitational search algorithm and its application on image segmentation, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 29, 93–103 (2014).
(26) S. Yazdani, H. Nezamabadi-Pour, S. Kamyab, A gravitational search algorithm for multimodal optimization, Swarm and Evol. Comput., 14, 1–14 (2014).
(27) V.P. Sakthivel, S. Subramanian, On-site efficiency evaluation of three-phase induction motor based on particle swarm optimization, Energy, 36, 1713–1720 (2011).
(28) F. Hamidia, A. Abbadi, Improved hybrid pumping system with stockage battery based on particle swarm algorithm, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. Et Énerg., 66, 4, pp. 243–248 (2021).
(29) M. Cunkas, A.R. Amazan, Design optimization of induction motor by genetic algorithm and comparison with existing method, Math. and Comp. Applications, 11, 3, pp. 103–203 (2009).
(30) V. Prakash, S. Baskar, S. Sivakumar, K.S. Krishna, A novel efficiency improvement measure in three-phase induction motors, its conservation potential and economic analysis, Energy Sustain. Dev., 12, pp. 78–87 (2008).
