PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY LITHOTRIPSY: THE ROLE OF BALLISTIC AND ULTRASONIC ENERGY

Authors

  • VICTOR CAUNI Colentina Clinical Hospital, Department of Urology Author
  • BOGDAN MIHAI Colentina Clinical Hospital, Department of Urology Author
  • FLORIN TANASE Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dept. of Urology, Bucharest, Romania Author
  • IRINA CIOFU Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dept. of Urology, Bucharest, Romania Author
  • CRISTIAN PERSU Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Dept. of Urology, Bucharest, Romania Author

Keywords:

Ultrasonic lithotripsy, Ballistic lithotripsy, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Abstract

The medical industry is in continuous search for improved techniques aimed at helping medical professionals treat urinary stones more effectively. When it comes to stones disintegration, several sources of energy are available, but two of them imposed as being the most effective: ballistic and ultrasonic. The aim of our paper is to review the literature in search for current evidence regarding the usage and limits of these sources of energy. We reviewed the latest papers on currently used devices for PCNL lithotripsy. We used as search terms “lithotripsy”, “ballistic lithotripsy” and “ultrasonic lithotripsy”, “combined lithotripsy”. Only original papers were considered eligible.

References

(1) I. Fernstrom, B. Johansson, Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique, Scand J Urol Nephrol 10, pp. 257–259 (1976).

(2) P. Alken, G. Hutschenreiter, R. Gunther, M. Marberger Percutaneous stone manipulation, J Urol, 125, pp. 463–466 (1981).

(3) J.E. Wickham, M.J. Kellet. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 283, 6306, pp. 1571–2 (1981).

(4) R. V. Clayman, V. Surya, et al., Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Extraction of Renal and Ureteral Calculi from 100 Patients, The Journal of Urology, 131, 5, pp. 868–871 (1984).

(5) J. D. Denstedt, P. M. Eberwein, R. R. Singh, The Swiss Lithoclast: A New Device for Intracorporeal Lithotripsy, The Journal of Urology, 148, 3, Part 2, pp. 1088–1090 (1992).

(6) W.P. Mulvaney, Attempted disintegration of calculi by ultrasonic vibrations, J Urol, 70, 5, pp.704–707 (1953).

(7) M. Chetan, A.M. Morega, Personal data network for outpatient medical monitoring devices, Rev. Rou. Sci. Tech., 53, 3, pp. 339–348 (2008).

(8) P.H. Lange, Diagnostic and therapeutic urologic instrumentation, In: P.C. Walsh, R.F. Gittes, A.D. Perlmutter et al, editors. Campbell’s urology, 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, pp. 510–40, 1986.

(9) M. Marberger, Disintegration of renal and ureteral calculi with ultrasound, The Journal of Urology, 131, 5, pp. 1023–1024 (1984).

(10) J. Grocela, S.P. Dretler, Intracorporeal lithotripsy: instrumentation and development, Urol Clin North Am, 24, pp. 13–23 (1997).

(11) J.M. Languetin, P. Jichlinski, R. Favre, W. von Niederhausern, The Swiss Lithoclast [Abstract], J Urol, 143, 179 (1990).

(12) S. Yinghao, W. Linhui, Q. Songxi et al, Treatment of urinary calculi with ureteroscopy and Swiss lithoclast pneumatic lithotripter: report of 150 cases, J Endourol, 14, pp. 281–283 (2000).

(13) B.H. Chew, O. Arsovska, D. Lange et al., The Canadian StoneBreaker trial: a randomized, multicenter trial comparing the LMA StoneBreaker and the Swiss LithoClast(R) during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, J Endourol, 25, pp. 1415–1419 (2011).

(14) M.H. Radfar, A. Basiri, A. Nouralizadeh et al., Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasonic Versus Pneumatic Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial, European Urology Focus, 3, 1, pp. 82–88 (2017).

(15) B.K. Yadav, R.B. Basnet, A. Shrestha, P.M. Shrestha, Comparison between shockpulse and pneumatic lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, World J Urol., 39, 3, pp. 915–919 (2021).

(16) K.H. Kurth, R. Hohenfellner, J.E. Altwein, Ultrasound litholapaxy of a staghorn calculus, J Urol,117, 2, pp. 242–243 (1977).

(17) E.N. Liatsikos, C.Z. Dinlenc, J.D. Fogarty et al., Efficiency and efficacy of different intracorporeal ultrasonic lithotripsy units on a synthetic stone model, J Endourol,15, p. 925 (2001).

(18) R.L. Kuo, R.F. Paterson, T.M. Siqueira Jr. et al., In vitro assessment of ultrasonic lithotripters, J Urol, 170, p. 1101 (2003).

(19) M.S. Borofsky, M.M. El Tayeb, J.E. Paonessa, J.E. Lingeman, Initial experience and comparative efcacy of the UreTron: a new intracorporeal ultrasonic lithotripter, Urology, 85, pp. 1279–1283 (2015).

(20) Auge BK, Lallas CD, Pietrow PK et al., In vitro comparison of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device, Urology, 60, 1, pp. 28–32 (2002).

(21) P. Olbert, J. Weber, A. Hegele et al., Combining Lithoclast and ultrasound power in one device for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: in vitro results of a novel and highly effective technology, Urology, 61, 1, pp. 55–59 (2003).

(22) D.S. Lehman, G.W. Hruby, C. Phillips et al., Prospective randomized comparison of a combined ultrasonic and pneumatic lithotrite with a standard ultrasonic lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, J Endourol, 22, pp. 285–289 (2008).

(23) A.E. Krambeck, N.L. Miller, M.R. Humphreys et al., Randomized controlled, multicentre clinical trial comparing a dualprobe ultrasonic lithotrite with a single-probe lithotrite for percutaneous nephrolithotomy, BJU Int, 107, pp.824–828 (2011).

(24) N.E. York, M.S. Borofsky, B.H. Chew et al., Randomized controlled trial comparing three diferent modalities of lithotrites for intracorporeal lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, J Endourol, 31, pp. 1145–1151 (2017).

(25) B.H. Chew, A.A. Matteliano, T. de Los Reyes et al., Benchtop and initial clinical evaluation of the ShockPulse stone eliminator in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, J Endourol, 31, pp.191–197 (2017).

(26) EC Carlos, DA Wollin, BB Winship, R Jiang, D Radvak, BH Chew et al., In Vitro Comparison of a Novel Single Probe Dual-Energy Lithotripter to Current Devices, J Endourol., 32, 6, pp. 534–540 (2018).

(27) M.J. Bader, M. Eisel, F. Strittmatter, U. Nagele, C.G. Stief, T. Pongratz et al., Comparison of stone elimination capacity and drilling speed of endoscopic clearance lithotripsy devices, World J Urol., 39, 3 (2021).

(28) R.B. Sabnis, S.S. Balaji, P.L. Sonawane, R. Sharma, M. Vijayakumar, AG Singh et al., EMS Lithoclast TrilogyTM: an effective single-probe dual-energy lithotripter for mini and standard PCNL, World J Urol., 38, 4, pp. 1043–50 (2020).

(29) C.U. Nottingham, T. Large, K. Cobb, R.L. Sur, N.E. Canvasser, C.L. Stoughton et al., Initial Clinical Experience with Swiss LithoClast Trilogy During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, J Endourol., 34, 2, pp.151–5 (2020).

(30) W. Khoder, F. Strittmatter, A. Alghamdi, M. Seitz, C. Stief, M.J. Bader, Comparative evaluation of tissue damage induced by ultrasound and impact dual-mode endoscopic lithotripsy versus conventional single-mode ultrasound lithotripsy, World J Urol., 38, 4, pp. 1051–5 (2020).

Downloads

Published

09.12.2021

Issue

Section

Génie biomédical | Biomedical Engineering

How to Cite

PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY LITHOTRIPSY: THE ROLE OF BALLISTIC AND ULTRASONIC ENERGY. (2021). REVUE ROUMAINE DES SCIENCES TECHNIQUES — SÉRIE ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE ET ÉNERGÉTIQUE, 66(3), 207-209. https://journal.iem.pub.ro/rrst-ee/article/view/20