DETECTION OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE VIA CLIFFORD GRADIENT-BASED RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK USING MULTI-DIMENSIONAL DATA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59277/RRST-EE.2024.1.18Keywords:
Parkinson's disease, Magnetoresonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalographic (EEG) signal, Clifford gradient recurrent neural networks (RNN), Deep learning, Stationary wavelet transform (SWT), Multiscale RetinexAbstract
Disease prediction is a vital step in the early diagnosis of many diseases in the overpopulated modern world. The prediction has gotten simpler due to advancements in various machine learning (ML) techniques. However, the complexity of the model and the choice of the best machine-learning method for the given dataset significantly impact its accuracy. Globally, there are many datasets, but their unstructured nature prevents them from being used in any useful way. To extract anything valuable for use in the actual world, various strategies are therefore accessible. To evaluate the model, accuracy now serves as a key metric. This research proposes a novel Cliff-PD to detect Parkinson's disease using a Clifford gradient RNN classifier with MRI and EEG signals. Initially, the MRI images are denoised using multi-scale Retinex (MSR), and the EEG signal is denoised using Stationary Wavelet Transform filters to reduce the noise artifacts. Then, the Clifford Gradient RNN is employed to classify the normal, Non-specific white matter hyperintensity and global brain atrophy using MRI images. Furthermore, the Clifford Gradient RNN is employed to classify the normal, generalized background slowing using an EEG signal. The performance of the proposed Cliff-PD model achieved an accuracy of 99.18 %. Compared with SVMs, AlexNet's, and CROWD autoencoder, the accuracy range is improved overall by 5.38 %, 10.36 %, and 3.2 %, respectively.
References
(1) R. Sharma, A. Kumar, R. Ray, Latest progresses and methods used to treat Parkinson's disease, International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 7, 9, pp. 574-582 (2022).
(2) A. Becerra-Calixto, A. Mukherjee, S. Ramirez, S. Sepulveda, T. Sinha, R. Al-Lahham, N. De Gregorio, C. Gherardelli, C. Soto, Lewy body-like pathology and loss of dopaminergic neurons in midbrain organoids derived from familial Parkinson’s disease patients, Cells, 12,4, pp. 625 (2023).
(3) E. Tolosa, A. Garrido, S.W. Scholz, W. Poewe, Challenges in the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, The Lancet Neurology, 20, 5, pp. 385-397 (2021).
(4) A. Lakshmi, A disease prediction model using spotted hyena search optimization and Bi-LSTM, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. Et Énerg., 68, 1, 113-118 (2023).
(5) T. Foltynie, S. Gandhi, C. Gonzalez-Robles, M.L. Zeissler, G. Mills, R. Barker, J. Carpenter, A. Schrag, A. Schapira, O. Bandmann, S. Mullin, Towards a multi-arm multi-stage platform trial of disease modifying approaches in Parkinson’s disease, Brain, 146, 7, 2717-2722 (2023).
(6) P. Mahlknecht, K. Marini, M. Werkmann, W. Poewe, K. Seppi, prodromal Parkinson's disease: hype or hope for disease-modification trials? Translational Neurodegeneration, 11, 1, pp. 1-13 (2022).
(7) A. Topor, D. Ulieru, C. Ravariu, F. Babarada, Development of a New One-Eye Implant By 3d Bioprinting Technique, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. Et Énerg., 68, 2, pp. 247-250 (2023).
(8) G.G. Tolun, Y.A. Kaplan, Development of Backpropagation Algorithm for Estimating Solar Radiation: A Case Study in Turkey. Revue Roumaine Des Sciences Techniques—Série Électrotechnique Et Énergétique, 68, 3, pp. 313-316 (2023).
(9) Y. Li, Z. Zhu, J. Chen, M. Zhang, Y. Yang, P Huang, Dilated perivascular space in the midbrain may reflect dopamine neuronal degeneration in Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 12, 161 (2020).
(10) K.L. Chou, P. Dayalu, R.A. Koeppe, S. Gilman, C.C. Spears, R.L. Albin, V. Kotagal, Serotonin transporter imaging in multiple system atrophy and Parkinson's disease, Movement Disorders, 37,11, pp. 2301-2307 (2022).
(11) A.K. Schalkamp, K.J. Peall, N.A. Harrison, C. Sandor, Wearable movement-tracking data identify Parkinson’s disease years before clinical diagnosis, Nature Medicine, 29 pp. 2048–2056 (2023).
(12) Z.K. Senturk, Early diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using machine learning algorithms. Medical hypotheses, 138, 109603 (2020).
(13) H. Gunduz, Deep learning-based Parkinson’s disease classification using vocal feature sets, IEEE Access, 7, pp. 115540-115551 (2019).
(14) S. Sivaranjini, C.M. Sujatha, Deep learning-based diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using convolutional neural network. Multimedia tools and applications, 79, pp. 15467-15479 (2020).
(15) M. Masud, P. Singh, G.S. Gaba, A. Kaur, R. Alroobaea, M. Alrashoud, S.A. Alqahtani, CROWD: crow search and deep learning-based feature extractor for classification of Parkinson’s disease. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 21,3, pp. 1-18 (2021).
(16) M. Wodzinski, A. Skalski, D. Hemmerling, J.R. Orozco-Arroyave, E. Nöth, Deep learning approach to Parkinson’s disease detection using voice recordings and convolutional neural network dedicated to image classification, 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 717-720 (2019).
(17) A.M. Elshewey, M.Y. Shams, N. El-Rashidy, A.M. Elhady, S.M. Shohieb, Z. Tarek, Bayesian optimization with support vector machine model for Parkinson disease classification, Sensors, 23, 4, 2085 (2023).
(18) X. Yang, Q. Ye, G. Cai, Y. Wang, G. Cai, PD-ResNet for classification of Parkinson’s disease from gait, IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 10, pp. 1-11 (2022).
(19) I. Gupta, V. Sharma, S. Kaur, A.K. Singh, PCA-RF: an efficient Parkinson's disease prediction model based on random forest classification, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.11287 (2022).
(20) H.A. Carvajal-Castaño, P.A. Pérez-Toro, J.R. Orozco-Arroyave, Classification of Parkinson’s disease patients—a deep learning strategy, Electronics, 11, 17, pp. 2684 (2022).
(21) A. Govindu, S. Palwe, Early detection of Parkinson's disease using machine learning, Procedia Computer Science, 218, pp. 249-261 (2023).
(22) K.B. Shah, S. Visalakshi, R. Panigrahi, Seven class solid waste management-hybrid features based deep neural network, International Journal of System Design and Computing, 01, 01, 1-10 (2023).
(23) B. Saravanan, M. Duraipandian, V. Pandiaraj, An effective possibilistic fuzzy clustering method for tumor segmentation in MRI brain image, Sixth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics, and Cloud) (I-SMAC, IEEE), pp. 823-827 (November 2022)
(24) R.R. Sathiya, S. Rajakumar, J. Sathiamoorthy, Secure blockchain-based deep learning approach for data transmission in IOT-enabled healthcare system, International Journal of Computer and Engineering Optimization, 01, 01, pp. 15-23 (2023).
(25) P. Naveen, P. Sivakumar, A deep convolution neural network for facial expression recognition, Journal of Current Science and Technology, 11, 3, pp. 402-410 (2021).
(26) S. Zafar, N. Iftekhar, A. Yadav, A. Ahilan, S. N. Kumar, A. Jeyam, An IoT method for telemedicine: lossless medical image compression using local adaptive blocks, IEEE Sensors Journal, 22, 15, pp. 15345-15352 (2022).
(27) J. Angel Sajani, A. Ahilan, Classification of brain disease using deep learning with multi-modality images. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, (Preprint), 45, 2, pp. 3201-3211 (2023).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 REVUE ROUMAINE DES SCIENCES TECHNIQUES — SÉRIE ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE ET ÉNERGÉTIQUE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
