THE EUKARYOTE ENDOSYMBIOTIC ORIGIN: A CONSTRUCTAL THEORY-BASED EXPLANATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59277/RRST-EE.2025.2.18Keywords:
Exergy destruction, Nucleus, Archaebacterium, Evolutionary designAbstract
The origin of eukaryotes is regarded as one of the most significant issues in the history of life. Various perspectives aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of eukaryote origins, drawing on paleontological evidence, energetics, the unique characteristics of eukaryotes, and the relationships between different eukaryotic groups. Several versions of the endosymbiotic theory have been proposed to explain the emergence of eukaryotes and their mitochondria. Only recently have energy and energetic constraints been integrated into this theory, recognizing that the prokaryotic cell structure played a crucial role in the development of eukaryotic complexity. Specifically, cells with mitochondria possess the bioenergetic capabilities necessary for this complexity, which explains the absence of transitional forms between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. This study explores eukaryotes' origins through the lens of constructal theory, which posits that “for a flow system to persist over time (to survive), it must evolve to facilitate easier and more efficient flow.” In this context, the theory suggests that the evolution of systems is driven by a need for optimal architecture and flow organization, reducing resistance to internal flows (exergy losses) that sustain the system. This framework is proposed as the underlying principle behind the origin of eukaryotes, mitochondria, chloroplasts, and the eukaryotic nucleus.
References
(1) F.D. Mast., L.D. Barlow, R.A. Rachubinski, J.B. Dacks, Evolutionary mechanisms for establishing eukaryotic cellular complexity, Trends in Cell Biology, 24, pp. 435–442 (2014).
(2) E.V. Koonin, Origin of eukaryotes from within archaea, archaeal eukaryome and bursts of gene gain: eukaryogenesis just made easier?, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 370, 20140333 (2015).
(3) T. Vellai, G. Vida, The origin of eukaryotes: the difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 266, pp. 1571–1577 (1999).
(4) H. Imachi., M.K. Nobu, N. Nakahara, Y. Morono, M. Ogawara, Y. Takaki, Y. Takano, K. Uematsu, T. Ikuta, M. Ito, Y. Matsui, M. Miyazaki, K. Murata, Y. Saito, S. Sakai, C. Song, E. Tasumi, Y. Yamanaka, T. Yamaguchi, Y. Kamagata, H. Tamaki, K. Takai, Isolation of an archaeon at the prokaryote–eukaryote interface, Nature, 577, pp. 519–525 (2020).
(5) D.A. Baum, B. Baum, An inside-out origin for the eukaryotic cell. BMC Biology, 12, 76 (2014).
(6) A. Bejan, S. Lorente, Constructal law of design and evolution: Physics, biology, technology, and society, J. Appl. Phys., 113, p. 151301 (2013).
(7) A. Bejan, G. Tsatsaronis, Purpose in thermodynamics, Energies, 14(2), p. 408 (2021).
(8) V.M. Kava, J.V.C. Vargas, J.C. Ordonez, The Eukaryote Endosymbiotic Origin: a Constructal Theory Based Explanation, In: 14th Constructal Law Conference – CLC 2024, Design in Nature and Evolution, Proceedings of CLC 2024, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, 10-11 October 2024, pp. 129–132 (2024).
(9) A. Bejan, Advanced engineering thermodynamics, Fourth edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc. (2016).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 REVUE ROUMAINE DES SCIENCES TECHNIQUES — SÉRIE ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE ET ÉNERGÉTIQUE

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.