ENHANCED SPIRAL DYNAMIC ALGORITHM WITH APPLICATION TO INDUCTION MOTOR PARAMETERS IDENTIFICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59277/RRST-EE.2025.4.2Keywords:
Spiral dynamic algorithm, Meta-heuristic, Induction machine, Identification, Spiral radius, Rotational angleAbstract
The spiral dynamic algorithm (SDA) is a metaheuristic characterized by the setting of parameters (spiral radius and rotational angle). The drawback of all meta-heuristic methods is the premature convergence, which occurs when a trade-off between exploitation and exploration is not maintained. SDA provides a good exploitation phase because all points are attracted to the best solution. But the exploration phase is poor when the spiral parameters are set to constant values during the whole search process. To improve SDA performance and circumvent premature convergence, this paper proposes an enhanced SDA in which the parameter settings vary simultaneously according to nonlinear functions. The effectiveness of the enhanced SDA algorithm (ESDA) was proven by identifying the electrical and mechanical induction motor (IM) parameters. This is achieved using the reference model method, in which the estimated parameters correspond to the minimum of the objective function. A comparison is established between the ESDA, SDAs, genetic algorithm (GA), and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The developed program and the estimation approach are tested using simulated and measured data from an IM (1.5 kW).
References
(1) Hanif Halim, I. Ismail, and D. Swagatam, Performance assessment of the metaheuristic optimization algorithms: an exhaustive review, Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 3, pp. 2323–2409 (2021).
(2) K. Satnam, K.A. Lalit, A.L. Sangal, and D. Gauravn, Tunicate swarm algorithm: a new bio-inspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 90 (2020).
(3) S. Ekinci, D. Izci, and L. Abualigah, A novel balanced Aquila optimizer using random learning and Nelder–Mead simplex search mechanisms for air–fuel ratio system control, J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 45, 68 (2023).
(4) D. Izci, B. Hekimoglu, and S. Ekinci, A new artificial ecosystem-based optimization integrated with Nelder-Mead method for PID controller design of buck converter, Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61, pp. 2030–2044 (2022).
(5) E. Boudissa, F. Habbi, N.E.H. Gabour, and M. Bounekhla, A new dynamic genetic selection algorithm: application to induction machine identification, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. Et Énerg., 66, 3, pp. 145–151 (2021).
(6) D. Naas, E. Boudissa, M. Bounekhla, and I. Dif, Firefly algorithm improvement with application to induction machine, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. Et Énerg., 65, 1, pp. 35–40 (2020).
(7) A.S.A. Bayoumi, R.A. El Sehiemy, and A. Abaza, Effective PV parameter estimation algorithm based on marine predators optimizer considering normal and low radiation operating conditions, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2021).
(8) A.A. Mekki, A. Kansab, M. Matallah, and M. Feliachi, Optimization of the inductor of an induction cooking system using particle swarm optimization method and fuzzy logic controller, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. Et Énerg., 65, 3–4, pp. 185–190 (2020).
(9) X. Jianzhong and F. YanBisht, Effective PV parameter estimation algorithm based on marine predators optimizer considering normal and low radiation operating conditions, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering (2019).
(10) K. Tamura and K. Yasuda, Primary study of spiral dynamics inspired optimization, IEEJ Trans Electric Electron Eng., 6, pp. 98–100 (2011).
(11) K. Tamura and K. Yasuda, Spiral dynamics inspired optimization, J Adv Comput Intell Inform, 15, 8, pp. 1116–1122 (2011).
(12) A.N.K. Nasir and M.O. Tokhi, Novel metaheuristic hybrid spiral-dynamic bacteria-chemotaxis algorithms for global optimisation, Applied Soft Computing, 27, pp. 357–375 (2015).
(13) E. Cuevas, A. Echavarría, and M.A. Ramírez-Ortegón, An optimization algorithm inspired by the States of Matter that improves the balance between exploration and exploitation, Applied Intelligence, 40, pp. 256–272 (2014).
(14) A.N.K. Nasir, M.O. Tokhi, N.M. Abd Ghani, and R.M.T. Raja Ismail, Novel adaptive spiral dynamics algorithms for global optimization, In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cybernetic Intelligent Systems (CIS), Guildford, UK, pp. 99–104 (2012).
(15) A.N.K. Nasir, M.O. Tokhi, N.M. Abd Ghani, and M.A. Ahmad, A novel hybrid spiral-dynamics bacterial-foraging algorithm for global optimization with application to control design, In 2012 12th UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI), pp. 1–7 (2012).
(16) M.R. Hashim and M.O. Tokhi, Chaotic spiral dynamic optimization algorithm, In 19th International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, London, UK, pp. 1–8 (2016).
(17) A.N.K. Nasir and M.O. Tokhi, An improved spiral dynamic optimization algorithm with engineering application, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst., 45, pp. 943–954 (2015).
(18) A. Accetta, F. Alonge, M. Cirrincione, M. Pucci, and A. Sferlazza, Parameter identification of induction motor model by means of state space-vector model output error minimization, In XXI International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), pp. 843–849 (2014).
(19) J.W. Rengifo-Santana, J. Benzaquen-Suñe, J.M. Aller-Castro, A.A. Bueno-Montilla, and A. Restrepo-Zambrano, Parameter estimation method for induction machines using instantaneous voltage and current measurements, Rev. Fac. Ing. Univ. Antioquia, 75, pp. 57–66 (2015).
(20) J. Chatelain, Machines électriques, In Traité d’Électricité, Vol. X, Lausanne, France: Presses Polytechniques Romandes (1983).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 REVUE ROUMAINE DES SCIENCES TECHNIQUES — SÉRIE ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE ET ÉNERGÉTIQUE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
