DIGITAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION EFFECTS IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY

n/a

Authors

  • DAN BIZUBAC Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Muncii Blvd 103-105, Cluj-Napoca, 40641 Author
  • BERND OTTO HOERMANN Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Muncii Blvd 103-105, Cluj-Napoca, 40641 Author

Keywords:

Computer integrated manufacturing, Enterprise resource planning, Innovation management, Organizational aspects, Technology management

Abstract

Industry 4.0 reshapes the manufacturing environment starting with improved technological processes, enhanced software implementations, and managerial approaches. Nowadays studies consider only the technical changes and do not assess the impact on the organizational culture, which can provide a better competitive advantage. The concepts approached in this paper are the automated guided vehicles technology (AGV), the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) software implementation, and their impact on the organizational environment. The researchers examined the symbiosis between physical innovations and sociocultural changes. The basis for the AGV technology employs mobile vehicles interconnected through a centered pathway decision-making system in a local wireless network. OEE indicators have been the latest software implementation in terms of reports for the production’s efficiency. Combining the two technologies has been proven sustainable in most of the situations researched, however, AGV autonomy and collision control remain incapable of providing efficient results. To determine the impact on the culture, a quantitative study was conducted using a survey. Findings have demonstrated that the Millennial generation is supportive of an innovative, informal culture. It is mandatory for employees to have a strong mentor who can influence in a positive way their career using technology and software changes.

References

(1) D.S. Landes, The Unbound Prometheus; Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present, Cambridge University Press, London (1969).

(2) G. Prause, S. Atari, On sustainable production networks for Industry 4.0. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 4, 4, pp. 421-431 (2017).

(3) B. Ebersberger, H. Lööf, Multinational enterprises, spillovers, innovation, and productivity. Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series, 22, pp. 1-40 (2004).

(4) S. Háša, R. Brunet-Thornton, (Eds.) Impact of organizational trauma on workplace behavior and performance, IGI Global Disseminator of Knowledge (2017).

(5) F. Hecklau, M. Galeitzke, S. Flachs, S.H. Kohl, Holistic approach for human resource management in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 54, pp. 1-6 (2016).

(6) C. Arnold, D. Kiel, K.I. Voigt, How the industrial internet of things changes business models in different manufacturing industries. Int. J. Innov. Manage., (2016).

(7) F. Rennung, C.T. Luminosu, A. Draghici, Service provision in the framework of Industry 4.0. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 221, pp. 372-377 (2016).

(8) S. Schneider, P. Spieth, Business model innovation: towards an integrated future research agenda. Int. J. Innov. Manage., 17, 1, 1340001, pp. 1-34 (2013).

(9) J. Qin, Y. Liu, R. Grosvenor, A categorical framework of manufacturing for Industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia CIRP, 52, pp. 173-178 (2016).

(10) H. Kagermann, W. Wahlster, J. Helbig, Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRY 4.0. National Academy of Science and Engineering, Berlin/Frankfurt (2013).

(11) W. Bauer, S. Schlund, D. Marrenbach, O. Ganschar, Industry 4.0 – Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland. BITKOM, Berlin (2014).

(12) C. Basnet, J.H. Mize, Scheduling and control of manufacturing systems: a critical review, Int. J. of Computer Integrated Manuf., 7, pp. 340-355 (1994).

(13) I. Sabuncuoglu, D. L. Hommertzheim, Dynamic dispatching algorithm for scheduling machines and AGVs in a flexible manufacturing system, Int. Journal of Production Research, 30, pp. 1059-1080 (1992).

(14) C.W. Kim, J. M.A. Tanchoco, Conflict-free shortest-time bidirectional AGV routing, Int. J. Production Research, 29, pp. 2377-2391 (1991).

(15) W.L. Maxwell, J.A. Muckstadt, Design of automatic guided vehicle systems, IIE Transactions, 14, 2, pp. 114-124 (1998).

(16) N. N. Krishnamurthy, R. Batta, H., Karwan, Developing conflict-free routes for automated guided vehicles, Operation Research, 41, pp. 1077-1090 (1993).

(17) W. Kaydos, Operational Performance Measurement: Increasing Total Productivity, St. Lucie Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA (1999).

(18) S. Nakajima, Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance, Productivity Press Inc.: Cambridge, MA (1988).

(19) S.H. Huang, J.P. Dismukes, J. Shi, Q. Su, M.A. Razzak, R. Bodhale, D.E. Robinson, Manufacturing productivity improvement using effectiveness metrics and simulation analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res., 41, 513–527 (2003).

(20) *** Standard SEMI Documentation Book, E79-0200 (2000).

(21) O. Ljungberg, Measurement of overall equipment effectiveness for TPM activities, Int. J. Operat. Prod. Manag., 18, pp. 495–507 (1998).

(22) O.O. Owoyemi, J.O. Ekwoaba, Organizational culture: A tool for management to control, motivate and enhance employees performance, Amer. J. Business Manag. 3, 3, pp. 168-177, (2014).

(23) S.P. Robbins, T.A. Judge, Organizational Behavior, 14th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. (2011).

(24) W.P. Onyango, Effects of organization culture on change management: A case of the vocational training center for the blind and deaf Sikri, Eur. J. Business Manag., 6, 34, pp. 204-214 (2014).

(25) M. Ahmed, S. Shafiq, The impact of organizational culture on organizational performance: A case study of the telecom sector, Global J. Manag. Business Res. H. Admin. and Manag., 14, 3, pp. 22-29 (2014).

(26) R.K. Agrawal, A. Tyagi, Organizational culture in Indian organizations: An empirical study. Int. J. of Indian Culture and Business Manag., 3, 1, pp. 102-110 (2010).

(27) E.A. Yildiz, Study on the relationship between organizational culture and organizational performance and a model suggestion, Int. J. of Res. in Business and Soc. Scie., 3, 4, pp. 103-110 (2014).

(28) R. McCarney, J. Warner, S. Iliffe, The Hawthorne effect: a randomized, controlled trial, BMC Medical Res. Meth., 7, 1, pp. 30 (2007).

(29) R. Plomin, J.C. DeFries, G.E. McClearn, P. McGuffi. Behavioral genetics, 5th ed. New York: Worth (2008).

(30) E.F. Keller, The mirage of a space between nature and nurture. Durham: Duke University Press, (2010).

(31) A.B. Guha, Motivators and hygiene factors of generation x and generation y-the test of the two-factor theory. Vilakshan: The XIMB J. of Manag., 7, 2, pp. 121-132 (2010).

(32) S. Hauw, A. Vos, Millennials’ career perspective and psychological contract expectations: does the recession lead to lowered expectations? J. of Business and Psychol., 25, 2, pp. 293-302 (2010).

(33) D. Anderson, E. Schragenheim, Agile management for software engineering: Applying the theory of constraints for business results, Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River (2004).

(34) D. Hussman, How to maintain and promote healthy agile culture. Extreme programming and agile methods - XP/Agile universe, 4th Conf. on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods. Calgary, Canada, August. pp. 190-191. Springer-Verlag (2004).

(35) R. Hackman, G. Oldham, Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, pp. 250-279 (1976).

(36) B. Bass, Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations, The Free Press, New York, NY, (1985).

(37) O. O'Donnell, R. Boyle, Understanding and managing organizational culture. Dublin, Ireland, Institute of Public Administration (2008).

(38) K.K. Myers, K. Sadaghiani, Millennials in the Workplace: A communication perspective on Millennials’ organizational relationships and performance, J. of Business Psychol., 25, pp. 225-238 (2010).

(39) J.A. Cogner, Training leaders for the twenty-first century, Human Resource Management Review, 3, 3, pp. 203-218 (1993).

(40) R.I. Mogos, C.N. Bodea, M.I. Dascalu, O. Safonkina, E. Lazarou, E.L. Trifan, I.V. Nemoianu, Technology-enhanced learning for Industry 4.0 engineering education, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn.–Électrotechn. et Énerg., 63, 4, pp. 429-435 (2018).

(41) J. Arhip, A. Borlan, O.G. Müler, Image processing for acquiring target coordinates with a platform, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn.–Électrotechn. et Énerg., 55, 4, pp. 426–435 (2010).

(42) B. Anton, A. Florescu, S.G. Rosu, Automotive battery management systems, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn.–Électrotechn. et Énerg., 63, 3, pp. 306–313 (2018)

Downloads

Published

02.04.2021

Issue

Section

Électrotechnique et électroénergétique | Electrical and Power Engineering

How to Cite

DIGITAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION EFFECTS IN THE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY: n/a. (2021). REVUE ROUMAINE DES SCIENCES TECHNIQUES — SÉRIE ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE ET ÉNERGÉTIQUE, 66(1), 41-46. https://journal.iem.pub.ro/rrst-ee/article/view/64