A PROTOTYPE OF DIRECT-DRIVEN ELBOW ORTHOSIS ACTELMO WITH HARD AND MYO ON/OFF CONTROL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59277/RRST-EE.2026.2.28

Keywords:

Active orthosis, Upper limb, Elbow, Muscle electromyographic (EMG) signal, On/off control

Abstract

Elbow joint disorders occur after stroke and other neurological disorders, daily or sports traumas, etc. Rehabilitation with technical devices is a promising approach for helping these people return to normal life. To present an active wearable direct-driven elbow orthosis, ActElMO, and to conduct experiments with healthy subjects. The 3D-printed orthosis, with its anatomical design, is directly driven by an electrical actuator. The onset of elbow flexion can be set manually, without user effort, or via an electromyographic (EMG) signal from the biceps brachii (BIC) muscle. Experiments with 10 healthy subjects at various flexion velocities used this on/off EMG control, with individual thresholds set. The EMG signals from the muscles BIC and triceps brachii, and the elbow angle were recorded and processed. Different ways of EMG signal processing were tested.  The chosen electrical motor provides sufficient power for rapid forearm movement with the orthosis. The device, including its trunk attachment, is user-friendly and convenient. The EMG signal from the BIC muscle is suitable for on/off control.

Author Biographies

  • SILVIJA ANGELOVA, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.

    Assist. Prof., Department of Motor Control, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences

  • ROSITSA RAIKOVA, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.

    Professor, Department of Motor Control, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences,

  • PLAMEN RAYKOV, Institute of Robotics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria.

    Assoc. Prof.

  • EMIL PETROV, Institute of Robotics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria.

    Assoc. prof., Mechatronic Bio/Technical systems

  • YASEN PAUNSKI, Institute of Robotics, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria.

    Assist. Prof. , Robotic and Mechatronic Intelligent Systems

References

(1) ***World Health Organization, Over 1 in 3 people affected by neurological conditions – the leading cause of illness and disability worldwide, pp. 1–10 (2024).

(2) N. Vitiello, T. Lenzi, S. Roccella, S. De Rossi, E. Cattin, F. Giovacchini, F. Vecchi, M. Carrozza, NEUROExos: A powered elbow exoskeleton for physical rehabilitation, IEEE Trans. Robot, 29, 1, pp. 220–235 (2013).

(3) R. Song, K.-Y. Tong, X. Huand, W. Zhou, Myoelectrically controlled wrist robot for stroke rehabilitation, J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitation, 10, pp. 1–10 (2013).

(4) V.L. Feigin, M. Brainin, B. Norrving, S. Martins, R.L. Sacco, W. Hacke, M. Fisher, J. Pandian, P. Lindsay, World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global stroke fact sheet 2022, Int. J. Stroke, 17, 4, pp. 478–479 (2022).

(5) ***The Lancet, Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2021: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021, pp. 1–10 (2024).

(6) O.A. Chiriac, Design and implementation of a cost-effective, functional electrical stimulation device for foot drop rehabilitation, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. et Énerg., 70, 1, pp. 151–156 (2005).

(7) Y.-J. Kim, C.-K. Park, K.G. Kim, An EMG-based variable impedance control for elbow exercise: Preliminary study, Adv. Robot., 31, 15, pp. 809–820 (2017).

(8) ***Myomo Inc., Myomo products and solutions, pp. 1–10 (2024).

(9) P. Macieasz, J. Eschweiler, K. Gerlach-Hahn, A. Jensen-Troy, S. Leonhardt, A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation, J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitation, 11, pp. 1–10 (2014).

(10) M.H. Rahman, M.J. Rahman, O.L. Cristobal, M. Saad, J.P. Kenne, P.S. Archambault, Development of a whole arm wearable robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and to assist upper limb movements, Robotica, 33, pp. 19–39 (2015).

(11) A.A. Blank, J.A. French, A.U. Pehlivan, M.K. O’Malley, Current trends in robot-assisted upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: Promoting patient engagement in therapy, Curr. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Rep., 2, pp. 184–195 (2014).

(12) M. Tiboni, A. Borboni, R. Faglia, N. Pellegrini, Robotics rehabilitation of the elbow based on surface electromyography signals, Adv. Mech. Eng., 10, 2, pp. 1–14 (2018).

(13) T. Lenzi, S.M.M. De Rossi, N. Vitiello, M.C. Carrozza, Proportional EMG control for upper-limb powered exoskeletons, Ann. Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 628–631 (2011).

(14) K. Kim, K.-J. Hong, N.-G. Kim, T.-K. Kwon, Assistance of the elbow flexion motion on the active elbow orthosis using muscular stiffness force feedback, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 25, 12, pp. 3195–3203 (2011).

(15) C. Pilatiuk, A. Kargov, I. Gasier, T. Werner, S. Sschulz, G. Bretthauer, Design of a flexible fluid actuation system for a hybrid elbow orthosis, IEEE 11th Int. Conf. on Rehab. Robotics, Kyoto International Conference Center, Japan, pp. 167–171 (2009).

(16) S. Angelova, E. Petrov, P. Raykov, R. Raikova, Experimental testing of a prototype of an active elbow orthosis based on in vivo investigation of elbow flexion/extension of healthy subjects, Int. J. Bioautomation, 26, pp. 1–10 (2022).

(17) T. Ripel, J. Krejsa, J. Hrbacek, I. Cizmar, Active elbow orthosis, Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 11, 9, pp. 1–10 (2014).

(18) T. Lenzi, S.M.M. De Rossi, N. Vitiello, M.C. Carrozza, Intention-based EMG control for powered exoskeletons, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 59, 8, pp. 2180–2190 (2012).

(19) A. Kyrylova, T. Desplenter, A. Escoto, S. Chinchalkar, A.L. Trejos, Simplified EMG-driven model for active-assisted therapy, Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Workshop on Rehabilitation & Assistive Robotics, Chicago, USA, pp. 1–6 (2014).

(20) C. Cipriani, J.L. Segil, J.A. Birdwell, R.F.F. Weir, Dexterous control of a prosthetic hand using fine-wire intramuscular electrodes in targeted extrinsic muscles, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., 22, 4, pp. 828–836 (2014).

(21) R.N. Scott, Myoelectric control of prostheses and orthoses, Bull. Prosthet. Res., pp. 93–114 (1967).

(22) R.A.R.C. Goputa, K. Kiguchi, Y.Y. Li, SUEFUL-7: A 7DOF upper-limb exoskeleton robot with muscle-model-oriented EMG-based control, The 2009 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, USA, pp. 1126–1131 (2009).

(23) J.S. Son, J.Y. Kim, S.J. Hwang, Y. Kim, The development of an EMG-based upper extremity rehabilitation training system for hemiplegic patients, 13th Int. Conf. on Biomed. Eng., 23, pp. 1977–1979 (2009).

(24) S. Angelova, S. Ribagin, R. Raikova, V. Veneva, Power frequency spectrum analysis of surface EMG signals of upper limb muscles during elbow flexion – a comparison between healthy subjects and stroke survivors, J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 38, pp. 7–16 (2018).

(25) J. Stein, K. Narendran, J. McBean, K. Krebs, R. Hughes, Electromyography-controlled exoskeletal upper-limb-powered orthosis for exercise training after stroke, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 86, 4, pp. 255–261 (2007).

(26) J. Cauraugh, K. Light, S. Kim, M. Thigpen, A. Behrman, Chronic motor dysfunction after stroke: Recovering wrist and finger extension by electromyography-triggered neuromuscular stimulation, Stroke, 31, 6, pp. 1360–1364 (2000).

(27) L.M.V. Benitez, M. Tabie, N. Will, S. Schmidt, M. Jordan, E.A. Kircher, Exoskeleton technology in rehabilitation: Towards an EMG-based orthosis system for upper limb neuromotor rehabilitation, J. Robot., pp. 1–13 (2013).

(28) A. Suberbiola, E. Zulueta, J.M. Lopez-Guede, I. Etxeberria-Agiriano, M. Graña, Arm orthosis/prosthesis movement control based on surface EMG signal extraction, Int. J. Neural Syst., 25, 3, pp. 1–10 (2015).

(29) S.T. Phyo, L.K. Kheng, S. Kumar, Design and development of a robotic rehabilitation device for post-stroke therapy, Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci., 5, 1, pp. 31–37 (2016).

(30) A. Suberbiola, E. Zulueta, J.M. Lopez-Guede, I. Etxeberria-Agiriano, M. Graña, Arm orthosis/prosthesis movement control based on surface EMG signal extraction, Int. J. Neural Syst., 25, 3, pp. 1–10 (2015).

(31) R. Son, K.-Y. Tong, X. Hu, L. Li, Assistive control system using continuous myoelectric signal in robot-aided arm training for patients after stroke, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst., 16, 4, pp. 371–379 (2008).

(32) H. Erol, Wind turbine pitch angle control with artificial neural networks, Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn. – Électrotechn. et Énerg., 70, 2, pp. 235–240 (2025).

(33) Z. Tang, K. Zhang, S. Sun, Z. Gao, L. Zhang, Z. Yang, An upper-limb power-assist exoskeleton using proportional myoelectric control, Sensors, 14, 4, pp. 6677–6694 (2014).

(34) Institute of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Mass and inertial characteristics of human body segments, pp. 1–10 (2024), https://biomed.bas.bg/en/projects/motco/data/ (Access Date January 6, 2025).

(35) S. Angelova, P. Raykov, E. Petrov, R. Raikova, A prototype of an active elbow orthosis – problems of mechanical design and orthosis control, Ser. Biomech., 35, 3, pp. 3–11 (2021).

(36) ***Robotis, Dynamixel XM540-W270-T servo motor, pp. 1–10 (2024).

(37) ***Robotis, OpenCM 9.04 microcontroller board, pp. 1–10 (2024).

(38) ***Arduino, Arduino IDE v2 software, pp. 1–10 (2024).

(39) ***MyoWare, MyoWare muscle sensor, pp. 1–10 (2024).

(40) T.S. Buchanan, G.P. Rovai, W.Z. Rymer, Strategies for muscle activation during isometric torque generation at the human elbow, J. Neurophysiol., 62, pp. 1201–1221 (1989).

(41) S. Angelova, M. Angelova, R. Raikova, Estimating surface EMG activity of human upper arm muscles using InterCriteria Analysis, Math. Comput., 29, 8, pp. 1–10 (2024).

Downloads

Published

02.06.2026

Issue

Section

Génie biomédical | Biomedical Engineering

How to Cite

A PROTOTYPE OF DIRECT-DRIVEN ELBOW ORTHOSIS ACTELMO WITH HARD AND MYO ON/OFF CONTROL. (2026). REVUE ROUMAINE DES SCIENCES TECHNIQUES — SÉRIE ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE ET ÉNERGÉTIQUE, 71(2), 335-340. https://doi.org/10.59277/RRST-EE.2026.2.28