OPTIMIZING VOLUMETRIC SOLAR AIR RECEIVERS: NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF POROSITY AND FLOW EFFECTS ON TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59277/CLC.2024.30Keywords:
Volumetric solar air receiver, Ceramic foam, Local thermal non-equilibrium model, Macroscopic approach, Thermal analysisAbstract
Ceramic foams are promising as absorber materials for volumetric solar receivers (VSR) in concentrated solar thermal power (CSP) systems. The temperature distribution of the VSR is very important to ensure that it operates efficiently and steadily. This study aims to simulate and analyze the temperature distribution within a VSR considering both the solid and fluid phases. The modelling of the open-cell volumetric receiver employs combined volume-averaged equations, assuming the ceramic foam to possess isotropic and homogeneous properties. To assess the pressure-drop in the VSR a non-Darcian model is adopted. A local thermal non-equilibrium (LTNE) model is implemented to describe the energy equations for both the solid and fluid phases.
Additionally, the study considers the influence of solar radiation as a heat source on the solid phase. The heat transfer between the surfaces of the volumetric solar air receiver's struts is calculated using the P1 model. At the same time, a macroscopic approach is utilized to evaluate the thermal profile of the ceramic foam. This study also aims to assess the impact of the VSR's porosity and cell size variation on the outlet air temperature. Moreover, the flow scheme of the flowing air, concerning the incident of concentrated radiation, is considered.
References
(1) Qudah A., Almerbati A., Mokheimer E.M.A., Novel approach for optimizing wind-PV hybrid system for RO desalination using differential evolution algorithm, Energy Conversion and Management, 300, p. 117949 (2024).
(2) Kauffman J., Lee K.-M., Eds., Handbook of Sustainable Engineering, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013.
(3) Al-Sulaiman F.A., Atif M., Performance comparison of different supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles integrated with a solar power tower, Energy, 82, pp. 61–71 (2015).
(4) Ávila-Marín A.L., Volumetric receivers in Solar Thermal Power Plants with Central Receiver System technology: A review, Solar Energy, 85, 5, pp. 891–910 (2011).
(5) Gomez-Garcia F., González-Aguilar J., Olalde G., Romero M., Thermal and hydrodynamic behavior of ceramic volumetric absorbers for central receiver solar power plants: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, pp. 648–658 (2016).
(6) Faizan M., Almerbati A., Yilbas B.S., A novel approach for volumetric solar receiver performance assessments, Appl. Therm. Eng., 211, p. 118487 (2022).
(7) Faizan M., Almerbati A., Yilbas B.S., Numerical investigation of turbulent flow across a SiC ceramic foam, International Journal of Energy Research, 46, pp. 14436–14451 (2022).
(8) Li, L. Xie, B. Zhao, W. Shen, Y. Liu, Analysis on the Effects of Different Receiver Structures and Porous Parameters on the Volumetric Effects and Heat Transfer Performance of Porous Volumetric Solar Receiver, International Journal of Energy Research, 2023, pp. 1–13 (2023).
(9) Wu Z., Caliot C., Flamant G., Wang Z., Coupled radiation and flow modeling in ceramic foam volumetric solar air receivers, Solar Energy, 85, 9, pp. 2374–2385 (2011).
