COLD PLATE DESIGNS: A COMPARISON OF EVALUATION METRICS -CONSTRUCTAL SVELTENESS AND GLOBAL RESISTANCE

Authors

  • CHAIANAN SAILABADA Department of Mechanical Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Energy and Sustainability Center, Center for Advanced Power Systems, Florida State University, FL, USA. Author
  • CRISTOFER HOOD MARQUES School of Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande -FURG, Rio Grande, RS 96203-900, Department of Mechanical Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, ESC, CAPS, Tallahassee, FL 32310, USA. Author
  • JOSE V.C. VARGAS Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate Program in Mechanical Engineering, PGMEC, and Sustainable Energy Research & Development Center, NPDEAS, Federal University of Paraná, UFPR, CP 19011, 81531–980, Curitiba, PR, Brazil. Author
  • JUAN CARLOS ORDOÑEZ Department of Mechanical Engineering, FAMU-FSU College of Engineering, Energy and Sustainability Center, Center for Advanced Power Systems, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32310, USA. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59277/CLC.2024.27

Keywords:

Cold plates, Conduction, Convection, Internal flow, Sveltness

Abstract

Cold plates are heat transfer devices used in various industries such as aerospace, automotive, and telecommunications primarily to prevent overheating and ensure efficient operation of electronics and power electronics components. They are compact, flat heat exchangers designed mainly by dissipate heat to a liquid coolant. The present paper compares the thermal performance of three serpentine arrangements using a global resistance metric that accounts for thermal resistance and pumping power. Then, various Svelteness definitions that differ in the external length scale are investigated. All the designs hold the same five degrees of freedom: plate area, plate weight, pipe diameter, pipe bend radius ratio, and plate length ratio, but only the two latter ones are investigated here. Results show that the simple “S” shape performs better regarding the global resistance metric, mainly for configurations with low values of the ratio between the bend curvature radius and the pipe diameter (R/d). The three variants of Svelteness capture the general thermal performance very well, particularly the R/d effect and the impact of the plate aspect ratio (W/d). However, none of the Svelteness definitions considered could completely capture the performance differences among the different arrangements measured with the global resistance metric. 

References

(1) Ordonez J.C., Sailabada C., Chalfant J., Chryssostomidis C., Li C., Luo K., Santi E., Tian B., Biglo A., Rajagopal N., Stewart J., DiMarino C., Thermal Management for Ship Electrification-Approaches for Power Electronic Building Blocks and Power Corridors, IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2024.

(2) Yoon Y., Hyeon S., Kim D.R., Lee K.-S., Minimizing thermal interference effects of multiple heat sources for effective cooling of power conversion electronics, Energy Conversion and Management, 174, pp. 218–226 (2018).

(3) Kobayashi H., Lorente S., Anderson R., Bejan A., Serpentine thermal coupling between a stream and a conducting body, Journal of Applied Physics, 111, p. 044911, 02 (2012).

(4) Almerbati A., Lorente S., Bejan A., The evolutionary design of cooling a plate with one stream, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 116, pp. 9–15 (2018).

(5) Mosa M., Labat M., Lorente S., Role of flow architectures on the design of radiant cooling panels, a constructal approach, Applied Thermal Engineering, 150, pp. 1345–1352 (2019).

(6) He L., Hu X., Zhang L., Xing T., Jin Z., Performance evaluation and optimization of series flow channel water-cooled plate for IGBT modules, Energies, 16, 13 (2023).

(7) Clemente M.R., Panão M.R.O., On the Svelteness as an Engineering Tool in Constructal Design: A Critical Review, Applied Sciences, 12, 23, p. 12053 (2022).

Downloads

Published

18.12.2024

How to Cite

COLD PLATE DESIGNS: A COMPARISON OF EVALUATION METRICS -CONSTRUCTAL SVELTENESS AND GLOBAL RESISTANCE. (2024). 14th CONSTRUCTAL LAW CONFERENCE | 10-11 October 2024, Bucharest, Romania, 2024(1), 105-108. https://doi.org/10.59277/CLC.2024.27